Players | ||||
S81 |
Michel Franssen |
- |
Scott Smith |
Sittard 8 |
S82 |
Nico van Beek |
- |
Willem Meyer |
Sittard 8 |
S91 |
Jan Timmer |
- |
Joost Bloemen |
Sittard 9 |
S92 |
Henk vd Heyden |
- |
Jef Dautzenberg* |
Sittard 9 |
* In regular competition designated MVP of Sittard 8, | ||||
but in this match substitute for Hans van Dijk in Sittard 9 |
|
|
|
1 = Garozzo-splinter, i.e. 4+ © support, some singleton or void, and either 8-11, or 16+
hcp.
2 = Asking for East's short suit.
3 = Singleton or void in ¨.
4 = §-control, denying ª-control.
5 = No reason for further action, since 6©
requires North to have ªK to start with, so
it's a 50% slam at best. Minor suit slams can be taken a little lighter, for several
reasons, see boards 10 and 11.
|
|
|
1 = In our system either a 2-suited semiforcing hand with a 5+ major, a
NT-hand with 22-25 hcp, or any gameforcing type of hand.
2 = Automatic relay, unless responder has a good 5-card suit (at least KQxxx or AJTxx), and
8+ hcp.
3 = Semiforcing or gameforcing 2-suiter with ª as first suit. East must keep the
auction going for at least one round.
4 = Second negative.
5 = Semiforcing 2-suiter with © as second suit.
The semiforcing range is 20-22 hcp or 8-9 playing tricks. Trickwise, East is on the top of
this range.
6 = At his previous turn of bidding, West was far too weak to raise to 3ª (would have been a slamtry), or even to sign off at
4ª. Now he is not
trying for slam, but telling he likes ª better
than ©.
7 = If West has ª-preference, East more than
likely will be able to ruff at least one ©, and
that's all he needs.
Game fails when North shows up with 2 trumps and less than 3©, but that unfavorable scenario comes up in less
than 2% of time.
|
|
|
1 = Bergen type of raise, 4+
©-support, balanced, and 7-9 hcp.
3 = No reason to even reach for game.
A ©-lead, and ª-shift from East would even deny South his +140. Even Bergen
players pay a price now and then.
|
|
|
28. Discussion to follow.
Back to Dutch Team Competitions of 2000
Copyright © 1999 by Michel Franssen