Sittard BC Internal Championships Imps Pairs 2002

Session 05, Baandert, Sittard, April 02, 2002


Group A, Boards 21-24


Copyright © 2002-2025 by Michel Franssen


Board 21
N/NS


WEST
NORTH
ª  Q J 9 2
©  J 8 7 4
¨  A Q 7
§  6 5




EAST
ª  8 5 4
©  T 6
¨  J 8 5 2
§  Q J 9 3



SOUTH
ª  A 7
©  A K Q 3
¨  K 6 4
§  T 7 4 2
ª  K T 6 3
©  9 5 2
¨  T 9 3
§  A K 8

NS score

Freq

imps NS

imps EW

110

1

4

-4

80

1

3

-3

50

1

2

-2

-90

4

-2

2

NS

avg =

-30


Recommended bidding sequence:

West North East South
--- pass 1NT pass
pass pass.

Room for analysis.


Board 22
E/EW


WEST
NORTH
ª  Q T 9 8 5
©  A T 6 2
¨  A 6 3
§  T




EAST
ª  7
©  8 7 5 3
¨  Q J 9 8 2
§  A J 8



SOUTH
ª  K 6 4
©  9 4
¨  T 7 5
§  K 9 7 5 4
ª  A J 3 2
©  K Q J
¨  K 4
§  Q 6 3 2

NS score

Freq

imps NS

imps EW

480

5

0

0

450

2

-1

1

NS

avg =

470


Recommended bidding sequence:

West North East South
--- --- pass 1NT
pass 2§ pass 2ª
pass 4ª pass pass
pass.

2§ = Stayman relay, ready to jump in hearts, when opener denies 4-card majors with 2¨. Such jump to 3© would show 5 spades, 4 spades, and 9+ hcp (Smolen transfer).

If NS trail by a long way in a team game, this board could bring them back into the match, for it makes 12 tricks when ªK is on side, and North is able to ruff either 1 diamond in dummy or 2 clubs in hand (dummy reversal). In all other situations, North should confine with 4ª.


Board 23
S/All


WEST
NORTH
ª  4
©  A 8 5 3
¨  K T 8
§  A T 8 6 4




EAST
ª  A
©  K Q J 4
¨  A 9 6 4 2
§  Q 7 2



SOUTH
ª  J T 9 7 5 3
©  T 6
¨  Q J 7
§  K 3
ª  K Q 8 6 2
©  9 7 2
¨  5 3
§  J 9 5

NS score

Freq

imps NS

imps EW

300

2

4

-4

200

1

1

-1

100

3

-2

2

-630

1

-13

13

NS

avg =

160


Recommended bidding sequence:

West North East South
--- --- --- pass
1¨ pass 1ª pass
2© pass 2ª pass
pass pass.

2© = Ordinary reverse: 5+ diamonds, 4+ hearts, 16-19 hcp, 1RF.
2ª = 5+ ª-suit, 6-7 hcp. With one more hcp, West should jump to 3ª to show 6+ suit, 8+ hcp, and force game.


Board 24
W/-


WEST
NORTH
ª  J 9 3 2
©  A 8 4 3
¨  J 7 3
§  J 7




EAST
ª  T 8 5
©  Q T 9 6
¨  A K T 4
§  5 3



SOUTH
ª  A K
©  J
¨  Q 8 6 2
§  A K Q T 6 4
ª  Q 7 6 4
©  K 7 5 2
¨  9 5
§  9 8 2

NS score

Freq

imps NS

imps EW

50

1

9

-9

0

1

9

-9

-440

2

-2

2

-460

1

-3

3

-490

2

-3

3

NS

avg =

-370


Recommended bidding sequence:

West North East South
pass pass 1§ pass
1© pass 2¨ pass
2ª pass 3§ pass
3¨ pass 3© pass
4¨ pass 4NT pass
5© pass 6¨ pass
pass pass.

1© = Walsh Approach, bypassing 4-card ¨-suit with less than 12 hcp. Needs alert.
2¨ = 5+ clubs, 4+ diamonds, 16-19 hcp. Ordinary reverse.
2ª = 4th Suit Forcing.
3§ = Extra length in clubs, unless East has no ª-stopper.
3¨ = Initiating slamtry in diamonds.
3© = 1st or 2nd round control of hearts.
4¨ = Waiting bid, denying controls in the blacks. This means that West has at least 2-card support in clubs.
4NT = Roman KeyCard Blackwood (1403-variation).
5© = 2 or 5 out of 5 aces, denying queen of diamonds.

The seemingly awkward pass-out of the score sheet originated after a ruling of director on an irregularity:

One EW-pair played some Precision Club system. East, focused on the hughe hand, opened 1§ out of turn. South chose not to accept this premature opening, so by Law 29B, the call of 1§ was cancelled, and the auction reverted to West. This was not the end of it. 1§ promised one of many types of hands containing zero or more clubs and 16+ hcp, and was therefore conventional by definition. Law 29C referred to Law 31, in order to find an answer to the question of how to deal with conventional bids (other than conventional passes, doubles and redoubles) out of rotation. Law 31B specifically indicated what to do when offender bids at partner's turn to call: compelling partner of offender to pass for the rest of the auction. With West compelled to pass, and North, East and South passing voluntarily, the auction was over.

West's obligation to pass throughout clearly did not damage the non-offending side, so Law 23 did not apply. Since the auction did not designate EW as defenders, the lead restrictions of Law 26B concerning withdrawn calls not related to specific suits, did not apply either.



Back to frontpage of Sittard BC Imps Pairs 2002