Sittard BC
Internal Championships Imps Pairs 2001
Session 05, Baandert, Sittard,
April 03, 2001
Group A, Boards 21-24
Copyright © 2001-2025 by Michel Franssen
Special thanks to Guillaume
Hermans and Scott
Smith
Board 21
N/NS
WEST |
NORTH
ª Q 7
© 8 7 3 2
¨ K 6
§ T 9 7 5 3 |
EAST |
ª J T 8 5 4
© Q J 9
¨ T 9 4
§ K J |
SOUTH |
ª A 9 6 2
© - - -
¨ A Q 3 2
§ Q 8 6 4 2 |
|
ª K 3
© A K T 6 5 4
¨ J 8 7 5
§ A |
|
|
|
NS score |
Freq |
mp NS |
mp EW |
|
-110 |
1 |
7 |
-7 |
|
-170 |
1 |
6 |
-6 |
|
-420 |
5 |
-1 |
1 |
|
-450 |
1 |
-2 |
2 |
|
-500 |
1 |
-3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
avg = |
-390 |
|
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
West |
North |
East |
South |
--- |
pass |
1§ |
1© |
1ª |
2© |
4ª |
pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
|
|
1ª = 5-card suit, since we have negative
doubles to show 4-card majors. East must alert.
2© = 4+ ©-support,
since we use support doubles to show 3-card support or to invite to game. At this
vulnerability, we do not recommend a preemptive raise of 3© with this particular hand.
4ª = With a 9+ fit in spades, void in their
suit, and 2 aces, West should have a fair chance, even with a minimum hand. Note, that
West actually makes game, even though his ©-holdings
are entirely wasted.
More analysis to follow.
Board 22
E/EW
WEST |
NORTH
ª A K
© K 6
¨ T 9 8 6 5 2
§ J 3 2 |
EAST |
ª 9 6
© Q J 8 4
¨ Q 7 3
§ A T 8 6 |
SOUTH |
ª 7 4 3 2
© A 9 7
¨ A K J
§ K Q 5 |
|
ª Q J T 8 5
© T 5 3 2
¨ 4
§ 9 7 4 |
|
|
|
NS score |
Freq |
mp NS |
mp EW |
|
-110 |
1 |
11 |
-11 |
|
-600 |
2 |
1 |
-1 |
|
-630 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
-660 |
5 |
-1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
avg = |
-640 |
|
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
West |
North |
East |
South |
--- |
--- |
1NT |
pass |
2§ |
pass |
2ª |
pass |
3NT |
pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
2§ = Stayman relay.
East must alert, since West may not have a 4-card major.
More analysis to follow.
Board 23
S/All
WEST |
NORTH
ª Q T 3
© T 8 2
¨ A K Q T 8 3
§ A |
EAST |
ª K J 6 4
© A Q
¨ 7 4
§ K Q 9 7 2 |
SOUTH |
ª A 7 5 2
© K J 9 7 3
¨ 9
§ J 4 3 |
|
ª 9 8
© 6 5 4
¨ J 6 5 2
§ T 8 6 5 |
|
|
|
NS score |
Freq |
mp NS |
mp EW |
|
-620 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
avg = |
-620 |
|
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
West |
North |
East |
South |
--- |
--- |
--- |
pass |
1§ |
1¨ |
1© |
pass |
1ª |
2¨ |
4ª |
pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
|
|
1© = A negative double
in this particular sequence requires 4-card suits in both majors,
or 12+ hcp, or both.
4ª = With an 8+ fit in spades, a 7+ fit in
clubs, a singleton in North's suit, 11 hcp, and an upgraded king*, not
jumping to game would be little short of chicken.
More analysis to follow.
*North has bid twice, while South has passed throughout. If North had a 6+ ¨-suit, and less than opening strength, he would have
had the option of making a weak jump overcall. If North's suit is too bad for an
vulnerable jump overcall, it will certainly be too bad to voluntarily rebid such suit,
when both opponents have bid, and therewith have exchanged vital information, that could
be used to double for penalties.
Board 24
W/-
WEST |
NORTH
ª 8
© K 8 5 3 2
¨ 5
§ J T 9 7 6 4 |
EAST |
ª J T 7 2
© T 9 6
¨ A 9 3 2
§ K Q |
SOUTH |
ª K 9 6 5 4 3
© Q
¨ K Q J
§ A 5 2 |
|
ª A Q
© A J 7 4
¨ T 8 7 6 4
§ 8 3 |
|
|
|
NS score |
Freq |
mp NS |
mp EW |
|
-420 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
|
-450 |
1 |
-1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
avg = |
-420 |
|
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
West |
North |
East |
South |
pass |
2© |
2ª |
4© |
4ª |
pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
2© = Sort of Muiderberg
weak-2: 5+ ©, 4+ of a minor, and 3-10 hcp. The
way we have been informed by (inter-)national directors in the Netherlands, the name of Muiderberg
is only allowed, when the hcp range lies between 5 and 11. If the name Muiderberg
is linked with 5+ major, 4+ minor, but less than 5, or more than 11 hcp, we are discussing
a so-called brown sticker convention.
Such partnership understandings are only permitted at national and international level of
competition, and only when the opponents have been informed in writing 'in
time' (= at least 8 days in advance, to our best knowledge).
2ª = 5+ spades, 12-15 hcp.
4© = Preemptive and business at the same time,
attempt to put West to a guess.
4ª = Preemptive and business at the same time,
no need to guess, but attempt to backfire the job of guessing to South. North is supposed
to pass quickly, for he has nothing to add to the story, he already told.
More analysis to follow.
Back to frontpage of Sittard BC Imps Pairs 2001