NBB - Dutch Bridge Federation
South Limburg District Class 1 Title Match
Sittard 8-Sittard 9
Sittard, De Baandert Community Center
December 05, 2000
Boards 17-24
| Players |
| S81 |
Michel Franssen |
- |
Scott Smith |
Sittard 8 |
| S82 |
Nico van Beek |
- |
Willem Meyer |
Sittard 8 |
S91 |
Jan Timmer |
- |
Joost Bloemen |
Sittard 9 |
S92 |
Henk vd Heyden |
- |
Jef Dautzenberg* |
Sittard 9 |
|
| * In regular competition designated MVP of Sittard 8, |
| but in this match substitute for Hans van Dijk in Sittard
9 |
Board 17
N/None
WEST |
NORTH
ª A T 6 2
© A K 8 2
¨ 8
§ Q 6 4 3 |
EAST |
ª Q 8 7 5
© Q J 9
¨ 7 5
§ J 7 5 2 |
SOUTH |
ª K 9 4
© 7 6 5 4
¨ K J 4 2
§ K 9 |
|
ª J 3
© T 3
¨ A Q T 9 6 3
§ A T 8 |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
3NT |
N |
430 |
1 |
|
S91 |
S82 |
3NT |
N |
400 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
38 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| --- |
1§ |
pass |
1¨1 |
| pass |
1©2 |
pass |
3¨3 |
| pass |
pass4 |
pass. |
|
|
17. (Discussion to follow)
Board 18
E/NS
WEST |
NORTH
ª 8 4 3
© K T 5
¨ T 5
§ Q T 8 3 2 |
EAST |
ª K T 7
© A J 8 7
¨ J 8 7 4 3
§ 4 |
SOUTH |
ª J 9 2
© 9 6 3
¨ A K 6
§ K J 9 7 |
|
ª A Q 6 5
© Q 4 2
¨ Q 9 2
§ A 6 5 |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
1NT |
E |
-150 |
|
|
S91 |
S82 |
2 ¨ |
W |
50 |
5 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
43 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| --- |
--- |
1§ |
1ª1 |
| dbl2 |
rdb3 |
pass4 |
1NT5 |
| 2¨6 |
pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
18. (Discussion to follow)
Board 19
S/EW
WEST |
NORTH
ª 8 4 2
© J 9 7
¨ 9 8 7 5
§ T 4 2 |
EAST |
ª Q J 7 5 3
© T 4
¨ J 6 2
§ 9 6 5 |
SOUTH |
ª 9
© A 8 6 3
¨ K T 3
§ K J 8 7 3 |
|
ª A K T 6
© K Q 5 2
¨ A Q 4
§ A Q |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
2NT |
S |
180 |
|
|
S91 |
S82 |
3NT |
S |
400 |
6 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
49 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| --- |
--- |
--- |
2§1 |
| pass |
2¨2 |
pass |
3NT3 |
| pass |
pass4. |
|
|
|
19. (Discussion to follow)
Board 20
W/All
WEST |
NORTH
ª A K Q J 7
© K 9 7 4
¨ T 7 4
§ 6 |
EAST |
ª 9
© 5 3 2
¨ J 8 2
§ A J 9 8 4 3 |
SOUTH |
ª 8 6 4
© A T 8
¨ A Q 9 6
§ Q 5 2 |
|
ª T 5 3 2
© Q J 6
¨ K 5 3
§ K T 7 |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
4 ª |
N |
620 |
10 |
|
S91 |
S82 |
2 ª |
N |
170 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
49 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| pass |
1ª |
pass |
3§1 |
| pass |
3©2 |
pass |
4ª3 |
| pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
|
Contract fails on a §-lead, followed by a ¨-shift from either side. More discussion to follow.
Board 21
N/NS
WEST |
NORTH
ª K 6
© 7 5 3
¨ K Q 7 4
§ A T 9 4 |
EAST |
ª Q 5
© K T 8
¨ T 9 6 3
§ K J 8 6 |
SOUTH |
ª A 9 7
© Q 4
¨ A 8 5
§ Q 7 5 3 2 |
|
ª J T 8 4 3 2
© A J 9 6 2
¨ J 2
§ - - - |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
4 ª |
S |
-100 |
|
|
S91 |
S82 |
4 § |
E |
150 |
6 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
55 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| --- |
1§ |
pass |
1ª1 |
| pass |
1NT |
pass |
2©2 |
| pass |
2ª3 |
pass |
pass4 |
| pass. |
|
|
|
|
21. (Discussion to follow)
Board 22
E/EW
WEST |
NORTH
ª K J 5 4
© T
¨ A Q 7 6 4
§ J 8 2 |
EAST |
ª A 9 8 6
© 9 8 5 4
¨ K
§ A 5 4 3 |
SOUTH |
ª T 3
© K Q 6 2
¨ J T 2
§ Q T 7 6 |
|
ª Q 7 2
© A J 7 3
¨ 9 8 5 3
§ K 9 |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
2NT |
S |
-50 |
|
|
S91 |
S82 |
2 ¨ |
N |
130 |
5 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
60 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| --- |
--- |
pass |
pass |
| pass |
1¨1 |
pass |
1©2 |
| pass |
1ª |
pass |
1NT3 |
| pass |
2¨4 |
pass |
pass5 |
| pass. |
|
|
|
|
22. (Discussion to follow)
Board 23
S/All
WEST |
NORTH
ª 6 5 3 2
© T 6 5
¨ A 5
§ A 8 4 3 |
EAST |
ª - - -
© Q J 7
¨ K T 7 6 3
§ K J T 9 5 |
SOUTH |
ª K J 9
© A 9 4
¨ Q J 8 4 2
§ Q 7 |
|
ª A Q T 8 7 4
© K 8 3 2
¨ 9
§ 6 2 |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
3 ª |
S |
140 |
|
|
S91 |
S82 |
5 ¨* |
W |
200 |
2 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
62 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| --- |
--- |
--- |
pass1 |
| pass |
pass |
1¨ |
1ª2 |
| 3ª3 |
dbl4 |
4¨5 |
pass6 |
| pass7 |
pass8. |
|
|
|
23. (Discussion to follow)
Board 24
W/None
WEST |
NORTH
ª 7 5 4
© T 9 8 4
¨ Q J T 8
§ J 2 |
EAST |
ª T 6
© A K 7 6
¨ 7 6 3
§ Q 8 4 3 |
SOUTH |
ª A 8 2
© J 5 3 2
¨ 4 2
§ A T 9 5 |
|
ª K Q J 9 3
© Q
¨ A K 9 5
§ K 7 6 |
|
|
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
by |
NS score |
mp NS |
|
S81 |
S92 |
3 ª |
S |
140 |
|
|
S91 |
S82 |
1 ª |
S |
170 |
1 |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
Sittard 8 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sittard 9 |
63 |
|
|
Recommended bidding sequence:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| pass |
pass |
pass |
1ª |
| pass |
2ª1 |
pass |
4ª2 |
| pass |
pass |
pass. |
|
|
1 = The advantage of Bergen raises is, that North can raise to 2ª with hands like this.
2 = Any trial bid would be too pessimistic for a team game, and give away the advantage
just mentioned. With 16 of his 18 hcp working, and a singleton in ©, South has enough to go to game by himself. Don't use conventions
unnecessarily.
Go to boards 25-28
Copyright © 1999 by Michel Franssen